All debates

No description has been provided

Abortion. Do I need to explain?

No description has been provided

el feminismo radical se enfoca en la lucha por la liberación de las mujeres de la opresión patriarcal, considerando que la opresión de las mujeres es estructural y está arraigada en las relaciones sociales, políticas y económicas. Las feministas radicales abogan por un cambio revolucionario y profundo en la sociedad para erradicar la opresión de las mujeres, y critican el feminismo liberal por considerar que solo busca la igualdad formal en vez de la abolición de las estructuras patriarcales.

No description has been provided

There is a great misunderstanding of America's first Amendment compared to other nations' understanding of Freedom of speech. the rules of the debate are as follows Pro must establish Freedom of speech has no limits as well as justify why this should remain the case. Con has to either prove that freedom of speech is in fact limited or give a strong argument as to why it should be limited even if it is not the case at present.

No description has been provided

BoP is shared. Each side argues that their system of governance for Taiwan is preferrable. PRO defends the status quo, CON defends rule by the PRC.

inspired by K michael, Unrated

Con will provide proof that Michael Jackson is guilty of the criminal charges he was accused of in 1993 and the accusations made by James Safechuck and Wade Robson. He said She said will not be good enough proof.

Ich hatte völlig berechtigt das, die Seifenblase zu zerplatzen.

Idealism and anti-idealism are two philosophical theories that center around the nature of reality and the relationship between the mind and the world. Idealists argue that reality is essentially mental or spiritual in nature, whereas anti-idealists deny this and assert that reality is fundamentally material. The debate has far-reaching implications for various fields, from metaphysics and epistemology to ethics and politics.

Let's get some serious folks. Accept if you're sure you can actually dedicate some time .

No description has been provided

Simple as said: Pro - agree w/ (Robots are going to increase the quality of life in humans) Con - disagree w/ (Robots are going to increase the quality of life in humans) Players play fair (no aggression) And judges (open voters') vote fair accordingly to the players arguments (no favouritism based on past debates)