Total debates: 269
mostly intended for fruit inspector but anyone can accept
I0_0I = Pro life Opponent = Pro Choice
There is no chance of CON winning this debate
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Christianity is often criticized for it's stance on moral issues. I am interested to hear if anyone can provide a consistent system of ethics that is superior to the Bible.
Hello everyone! I have heard and seen a nonstop flow of political rhetoric from both main U.S parties (Democratic and Republican). Anyhow, I wish to delve into and hopefully debunk what I find to be bad ideas from both sides of the aisle. In this second installment (see the border wall debate) I wish to switch party lines and take on federal government benefits (including health care and welfare) that many mainstream Democrats defend.
No description has been provided
The Titanic is sinking. There are not enough lifeboats for everybody. This debate is about the policy of prioritizing women and children for life boat seats during the sinking of the Titanic. Death23 is CON. Death23 is arguing AGAINST women and children first.
No description has been provided
I'm becoming increasingly convinced of this view. I'm interested to see what y'all think as opposed to not-so-good ol' DDO.
By "exist" I mean to have objective being in reality. By God I mean an omnipotent, eternal being. By motion, I mean the actualization of a potential, in other words, change.
Scientist believe that a pig is as smart as a 3 year old child.
| Abortion is moral | Theweakeredge: Pro | Contender: Con
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
"I think and therefore I am" - can science kill its creator, the mind?
Resolved: It is illogical and impractical to oppose that which does not exist.
I (Pro) will argue that morality is subjective. My opponent (Con) will argue that it is objective.
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
| Wagyu Pro | Contender Con |
Calm debate concerning the nature of reality.
| Homosexuality Is Not Moral | Wagyu's: Pro | Contender: Con |
Trying to flesh out ideas in Kantian Ethics. A debate should help me structure my thoughts.
No description has been provided
Instigator Position: Affirmative (Pro) "Gender is not a binary" Contender Position: Negative (Con) "Gender is a binary" BoP is shared
No description has been provided
Come in. The full description is what you are reading.
No description has been provided
Utilitarianism is a moral system, which I will defend in the debate.
4 rounds - 30,000 character limit : Theweakeredge: "Objective morality is not real" Let's try this one again, shall we?
No Covid conspiracy theory allowed either for or against flat earth theory.
No description has been provided
The Kalam Cosmological Argument is an argument for the existence of God.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Morality - most topically defined by Merriam Webster as "a doctrine or system of moral conduct" Objective - the best summation by Merriam Webster I found would be " having reality independent of the mind" Perhaps humanity would run wild without it. Perhaps nothing could function without it. But that doesn't change the question. Does it exist? Yes? Well then, come on down and convince me and any of my fellows who agree.
Topic: Is abortion ethical? I will be taking the PRO position, as in, "Abortion is ethical". This is to kind of follow up the pattern of my other two debates, I look forward to any acceptees.
No description has been provided
The Kalam Cosmetological Argument is an argument for the existence of of God
No description has been provided
This is meant to serve as a short demo debate so I can assess the potential of a full debate later on.
I will be supporting the position that God is not necessary for objective morality, while my opponent will be supporting the position that God is necessary for objective morality.
No description has been provided