All debates

You fear to debate an individual, you constantly avoid debating them. Is that true or false?

By dueling I am talking about the right for at the minimum two people agree to meet in some formal way sanctioned by law and fight each other in mortal combat, even to the death, though this is not to say it could end with a first blood or no blood with both opponents honor satisfied. Debate can be cut short, 'if agreed to by both parties in the debate comments.

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

Marriage between Prophet Muhammad (saw) and Aisha (RA) Marriage was normal (especially for that era) Marriage was Successful. There were no grievances from any side. It was acceptable until recently.

No description has been provided

I believe that morality is subjective

показать образ в казахской литературе который достоин прославляться

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

No description has been provided

(challenge to rational macmahon) he isn’t confident in his rapping ability so i will teach him.

Pro (me) argues for ability to ban books at schools by parents - whilst a parents complains about a book and that book is investigated and then banned or not banned. Con argues that parents should not be able to ban books at school libraries regardless of process or pocession.

Just to be very clear, neither the IDF or Hamas are the "Good guys", both sides have killed civilians, both sides have their own complex reasoning for their actions, and both sides have very evil people supporting them. Yes, missiles aimed at fighters can hit civilians, Hamas has a streak of building bases next to women and children, Israel has a streak of subjugating the Palestinians, But i'm just saying that the broad actions of the IDF are justified in the context of the attack.

No description has been provided