Total topics: 397
I set this up extremely fair. Supadudz's one rewards those who are online, much more. I have a waiver structure and the aeason has already begun, meaning more informed decision goes into deafting.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Sports
It is very hard to make this thread without living up to the completely false depiction of me that the guy who now goes by 'David' and went by Virtuoso before, has laid out via his sock-puppet Ragnar. I am not worried about being banned for this, after all I was quite literally banned over pure lies so cleverly drawn that even an intelligent member like Discipulus_Didicit ended up mocking me when the evidence he was mocking was literally what I said it was. This goes deeper than simply abusing authority and twisting things to avoid admitting that they banned me simply for being courageous and not easy to tame, Virtuoso has lied to you throughout about his very role in moderating.
Ragnar is the alpha male of this website, so Virtuoso asked him to ban me for 6 months. I have this on good authority and while my sources remain secret, I am not afraid of the mod team interrogating some of their members to find out who told me this. It was already 100% known to me that Virtuoso was the spineless coward behind this entire thing because of something very interesting that I completely forgot to bring up in the original thread where I pointed out that all the accusations were lies:
Virtuoso promised us all when he became chief moderator that we had our slates wiped clean of any previous mishaps under the Bsh1 regime, yet 90% of the evidence they hint at or try to drag me through the mud with when called out on proof was prior to this Tabula Rasa.
On top of this, the multi-accounting, doxxing and all of it are complete and utter fabrications as I never once did them on this website.
I am not okay with my username being dragged through the mud and I am fully aware that the 'most mature' way to handle this would be to quit the site permanently without posting this thread but I had to just post this to both clear my name and make very fucking clear to 'David' that I know what he did to me and that others should be extremely weary of his backstabbing weasel who will abuse any and all trust you give to him.
I did not ever do 'targetted harassment', if any one single member came close to receiving something like that from me, it was when they'd severely bully me and/or others and I wouldn't stand for it. There are three examples given and the most severe one that remotely was something I should regret and do, it was with a user who himself was completely against my ban and told Ragnar not to ban me. This user has been in some contact with me since and we are on amicable terms so to speak. I don't know who the fuck the mods think they are but you do not just ban RM based on pure lies and think he won't tell you about all your mishaps afterwards.
- Seldiora - This is the biggest joke I have seen in a while, I am not sure what to say but Seldiora doesn't feel harassed by me. I asked a member of the website to fully ensure this was the case and I will now tell you that this member was Supadudz. It is up to him to step up to the plate and reveal the corruption and lies regarding both the 'harassment' and 'multi-accounting' which Ragnar and Chris both silenced him on and pleaded ignorant when he demanded proof.
- Lunatic and 'DuhHamburgler' - Both on amicable terms with me, were against the ban vehemently and said they did not feel harassed by me and accepted it was a 2-way exchange where I was reacting to them.
- 'Other people constantly', yeah? Like who? I can name a few and help you justify my ban better for you. Some people I did not harass but did engage with in a hostile manner on a regular basis were serial bullies Zeichen, Ramshutu and... ? Maybe Zarroette but that was very, very much me being harassed as were the other cases involved. These were members who were abusing me under the Bsh1 regime that Virtuoso explicitly promised to stand against and give us all forgiveness for what we did. I neither agreed with this 'flat out forgiveness' nor am I shocked that when it suited his agenda he forgot he promised that and used Ragnar as a shield to make people not realise who was going back on whose word but David, I see you man. Get some fucking balls and admit you were behind this, let's talk it out here in the open, no more shady PM chats or backstabbing yeah?
As for the idea that I multi-accounted, that's just a lie, literally. Ragnar has been lied to by Virtuoso AKA David. The latter has told the former that me, the guy who single-handedly exposed Sparrow for being Type1 because I let mods be privy to information and clues in what Sparrow was rapping and debating about (as well as his typing style) that he was the user Type1 who he ended up not just using a sock puppet to abuse verbally with but exchange votes, wins/losses etc. I am apparently the guy who later on 'arranged' with the guy I had exposed to the mods to feed me free wins. I cannot even being to explain how utterly irrational you must be to conclude this but furthermore where is the proof?! I happened to be online when Type1 made an alt and posted some debates about veganism vs raw meat or whatever else and I knew it was Type1 based on that, so I admit I accepted the debates knowing it was him. Then the mods banned the account (which I told them was him) and then what? What are they saying? Make it clear.
As for the last thing, I apologise to Ramshutu for the perceived threat. In technicality I literally asked him permission, he even gave it and I still kept asking permission at which point the chief moderator Bsh1 told me that this was not the thing to be doing and I never did anything. I am sorry for the distress but do I like Ramshutu? Well no, however I do take back what was said. I am sorry for being potentially abusive to someone I severely resent. The resentment doesn't justify my loss of self-control. I did not actually lose self-control in actions but in speech I somewhat did. I am aware that the line is important and true anger management would mean I'd be controlling my words, I do that but sometimes it is indeed healthy to get things 'out there'. Regardless, Ramshutu and I no longer have bad blood between us and that's largely in part due to him opting out of using the website which he made very clear by saying 'hi' when I got banned.
Let's see what Virtuoso says to this because trust me, I think him and I confronting one another is long overdue. No Ragnar, No voting moderator that got promoted out of nowhere to site moderator 'MisterChris' AKA Christopher_Best, just you and me David. Come now and tell us the truth. If you want proof that he explicitly promised the clean slate upon being crowned Chief Moderator, you need to do your own digging for the full depth and context of the promise as it was a lot of drama at once but here was the thread he mentioned it in, explicitly:
You are cornered now, if you deny what you said and try and demonise me further, I will bring up all the active good and protection I have given victimised members of this site. Don't you dare come and paint me as a villain man, just don't try.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I am being banned for apparently:
- Doxxing
- Coordinating with banned users to give me free wins
I have never done either of these things. In fact, I regularly helped the mods notice banned users before any free wins were given by their accounts. Idk who I doxxed on DART or wtf happened but it's a lie too.
Do whatever you want here, cowards will be cowards. Ragnar is not a coward, he is just delusional.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
There is a secret to climbing the ranks on this website that I never revealed to anyong for all this time.
Your username needs to have 'magi' or 'ra' in it as significant sections of the username (so not in the middle).
I'm sorry Ethang5, it was never about being liberal. That was just the illusion.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Prove me wrong, Steven Crowder fans.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Choose the right option:
- He has moved on from the site in an emotional sense but clings on for the glory of his role.
- He has moved in from the site for both emotional and job-related reasons but clings on out of a sense of loyalty and struggle to help a site he once frequented.
- He has converted to a branch of Buddhism that has sworn him to silence.
- He is a coward and this is a callout thread.
I think it's option 2.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Like when a bladder is full.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I will be revealing the results bit by bit, Round by Round.
I will also be giving my own song choice for each Round (not the one that necessarily fits the category best but the one that I'd enter into the competition with RM as the host, aiming to score high).
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Forum games
Just PM me your entries on PM on this site, I'm not giving Discord to ppl I don't know as such but those who 'know' me on there already can use it.
I will not be just scoring it based on an 'overall out of 10' with decimal points making it actually out of 100.
I will be splitting up into the following categories:
- Originality (how truly original it is for the era and genre, even if it's mainstream)
- Obscurity (how hard is it to find, how unknown? Not just based on how few views things have, I'll use more research to judge this)
- Aura/Vibe and how it makes me feel. (I do not like to feel too calm or too the opposite. I don't like to feel too sad but a song that makes me cry can actually score high here if it's good at doing it, take a gamble and see what I give)
- Quality of lyricism for the Genre (so mumble rap will score low for hip hop but something just as unlyrical in electronic music may score medium-high)
- Sexiness/pleasure of the Voice and instruments to my eardrum AKA Delivery.
- How relistenable it is (this is not the same thing as how catchy it is because if it's catchy but after a few listens I hate that it's so catchy and stuck in my head, it will only score medium here)
I will score each category out of 20. The highest of each category by Mean Average score will be given a so-called 'medal' while the highest average of those averages will win.
- A song that will blow my mind.
- A song for dancing to.
- A song to chill out while listening to.
- A song with a dark theme.
- A song that makes you involuntarily daydream.
- A song where the vocal artist(s) has/have (an) extremely soothing voice(s).
- A song where the production quality is brilliant.
- A rap that encapsulates the genre which it is.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Forum games
If you're in a situation where you're too busy and too worried about about what your opponent will say back to you, just forfeit the Round (it is more optimal, the shorter that the character count is but only if it's above 2k since if it's below 2k it's also not optimal to do).
For medium-character-limit debates where the opponent feels as if they aren't going to try too hard if you forfeit, you are better off sacrificing the Conduct point (which is only 1 vs the 3 points that arguments give) to disarm them. They won't fight back hard enough the next Round unless they are a true 'blood, sweat and tears' type of debater but you need to size your opponent up and know which one to do this with vs not.
More often than not they subsconsciously react to your forfeit with 'extend all arguments' or basically 'ah, let's see if he/she says something next Round' rather than using the extra Round to a fuller extent, expanding their points. They rarely go 'oh it's RM, he may actually turn up in a later Round and win'.
Of course, this only works for a while, eventually opponents will pick up on what you're doing but it's a 'cycle' because even if they know you do it, they can't feel the urge to put in the work for what they perceive as a free win.
This is most effective when you've noticed a flaw in the opponent's Round 1 or 2 and they (not you, they) have 2 further Rounds remaining (at least). What you want to do is forfeit so that they don't have an extra Round to bolster their case against your fatal attack to it. If you give them an extra Round of typing and reaction, you only make life harder for yourself. If they have only 1 Round left, point out the flaw so that voters don't accuse you of bringing it too late for the opponent to react, that can backfire.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I have seen first-hand with bsh1 that what is said in Mafia games can get you punished. This is actually correct.
I was told by Ragnar that it's okay for a user I'll happily name in this OP but can't so that it's not a callout thread, that they'd tase my genitals IRL as a passing joke in a mafia game to highlight that I 'owed them' some information and they'd torture me for it if this was IRL (they genuinely said this). Because the user is Ragnar's favourite, it's been oushed away as a passing joke.
I will be sure to show many others this comment if ever they compliment this fucktard teacher's pet user and I promise that this comment will not be forgiven until this user admits what they said was a threat, was wrong and that it in no shape or form deserves leniency.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
This is a thread where if you post in it, I will describe your strategy of debating to you in a comedic martial art metaphor manner.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I don't know how or why politics has become a social media shitshooting contest but even at that level of immaturity, Biden still has more substance to his posts than Trump. So, to me it's very simple, both candidates are becoming immature and #voteme #otherguyiscorrupt #yoloswag though Biden seems to do this in a more in-depth and sophisticated manner with actual reasoning behind his social media jabs. Trump just shitposts and loves doing it, his post length alone should make that obvious.
Thus, I do not understand either side making this about 'the other side is a tantrum thrower' this is about more than that, you need to analyse the regime they stand for and how they're going about things. Trump is corrupt to the core and has been completely pro-establishment his entire time as President, despite his promise to be a rebellious lover of the working American. You can think what you want, it's just a fact. He's handled Covid so terribly that the US is the only fully developed country that is having an upswing of cases, all other highly developed countries that US would call its equal or inferior, are on downswing pretty much.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
This website is proof that dictatorship can be benevolent if it's done with respect to the populace.
If you observe what this website runs on, it is not democracy in theory and yet the populace is respected by those in power. DART is a benevolent dictatorship and is proof that it can actually be done and thus that democracy itself is not the highest importance in a political system but instead respect for all is the utmost priority.
This is not proof that Republicanism is superior to Democracy, as this site is also not actually a Republic since each MEEP and discussing in threads that led to the rules and continues to shape them isn't how a Constitution with 'irrevokable rights' is formed or regarded.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
That's a fact, debate-Rating will eventually match my prowess in the Forums arena and I shall thwart all. Full respect to Sun Tzu and also to the book 33 Strategies of War by Robert Greene.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Beat to Loop for the rap: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbGNNAnkWJA
What I see is people talking big, their white privilege is evident,
Spoilt brats born rich, think their ancestor's wealth is heaven-sent,
Think they deserve a cent of it, then wonder why the rest resent the fact that blacks have inheritance far less common and the bottom of the barrel's only low due to past prejudice still rendering results the remain prevalent,
What do you know about it? Petulance among caucasions blessed with tenament,
They used to own all votes but cannot gloat the privilege anymore; protestors got the betterment thanks to Democratic president's benevolence,
I know Lincoln freed the slaves, but the was a fuck-ton more to fix and that he never did,
Civil Rights, affirmative action and practically every tax that helped them was down to Dem's development,
Some of you are blaming B-L-M for their reverence towards a party that blatantly helped the blacks so much and today is dedicated to egalitarian prevalence,
I suggest getting your head out of your ass, read less Mein Kampf and your Faux Fox News and more objective facts that'll slap the ignorance out of your mind so fast it's like a zap of electric intelligence,
You look at looters and think they represent the protests when they are literally hurting black business owners, you're a moron for suggesting it,
Get to grips with reality, commit less logical fallacies and open your mind to the issue that's affecting many African-American residents.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Yes it should.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
There is an experiment we can have the government carry out on many children and note and then correlate to those who choose in the future to openly support a political wing but it only can work if many are in the sample.
I strongly believe that adolescence masks true ideology and has a lot more delineation with one's true core system of ethics and social reasoning than childhood or adulthood do. I furthermore assert that those of us who seem to have changed our minds in life on politics had events and hormonal imbalance in teenage years that merely already pushed us away from the true wing we are.
What I am suggesting is that politics is far more nature than nurture but that nurture can force one who is built with one wing's psychology to vote the other only as a lesser evil and they will be anomalies in what I describe.
The sharing-justice duality test.
I want you to give a toddler/child the scenario where they believe that someone in on the experiment in front of them has stolen stealthily, bullied and finally convinced with words, another person (also in on it) to give them something that the child themselves values a lot and that the other seems visibly sad to have lost.
What is measured is the level of empathy, aggression, sadistic amusement, ambivalence etc that the subject displays towards the three situations.
It is important that the subjects are not having this done by or towards someone close to them, it must be strangers or people the child has barely met get (perhaps interacted with once first, to build some rapport, this will be fine-tuned).
My hypothesis
Children who most fervently respond to the injustice in all three scenarios will be very passionate about politics as hey grow, regardless of wing. Those that truly are upset by all three scenarios, will be passionately left-wing, while those who are among the fervent that only reacted much when force was used, will be passionately right-wing. Those that are fervent with 2 scenarios but not in particular with one, will be centrists who grow cynical of the whole system.
Those that take sadistic amusement, least when the person is talked out of it, and giggle at the whole situation, will grow to become right-wing Libertarian or some corporatist variant (even as far as ancap but not necessarily).
Those that seem to not care much at all, will grow to not vote.
Those that display fear and try to escape the room or look down at the ground wishing they could help, will become social democrats AKA progressives of a less severe kind than the fervent types.
It will be discovered that any other possible reaction combination simply never happens. It will be important to do the talking part last, so that the child understands that the talk is based on guilt-trip manipulation and not just genuine care and share mentality. The children who react barely at all to the talking part but to the other two will be left-leaning centrists while other 2-1 combinations will fluctuate in life, as the cynics hypothesised.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
The title speaks for itself, it's time to get to the fucking truth of it. You posers talk of 'oh yaaa he's a rebel and isn't esablishment oh yaaaa wee wooo' he is showing his true face when he assassinates generals on sovereign soil of Iraq (not even Iran) because he's too much of a pussy to do it on Iran's soil so he will kill an Iranian General there on Iraqi soil to play a game of 'ooh I didn't violate any rule'. He is a straight up bitch who has fucked around too much with all poor people and ethnically with Hispanics, now Black Rights protesters and not to mention the deep and pure hatred he has for all variety of Muslims.
He is a shit stain on presidency, humanity and right-wing pigheaded politics. End of the fucking discussion, report this post I do not give a shit as I didn't break a rule.
I am sick of him, his putrid face in the news makes me furious to even see. I wish they put a wasp on the photos instead of his face. Trump is a wasp, he serves no purpose to the political ecosystem whatsoever; he is there to sting and mimic useful things like bees, in appearance.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
I replied this to Fauxlaw's debate:
The frequency of wrongful convictions, overly-brutal sentences and the very pressures (financial and sociological) that drive one to crime are all very much harshest against those of the 'black' race due to many things in the past trickling down generations.The gap between whites and blacks of average income, education quality and stuff like that is getting worse (but obviously not 'worse' than literal slavery) as time goes by. The less opportunity they have, the more pressures there are to become a criminal to ever be more than a blue collar worker for life on a dirt-cheap wage that can barely uphold themselves, let alone their families, especially if relatives get sick.It's also the case that generally speaking, caucasians in poverty have somehow got distant relatives to help them out, however I am not suggesting that they have it 'easier' by a large margin at all. The issue is that the system is overall rigged against blacks because due to all the things I've mentioned there is a bias against people of that ethnicity that says they are more likely to have done crimes (since they're more commonly driven towards it as they are desperate for money and have far less opportunity to get it). This bias runs deep in both mentality of not hiring and promoting them as well as convicting them of crimes.This is the core thing that needs to be altered in MANY 'white' countries that previously enslaved and continually discriminated against blacks in recent generations. The effect is still being had on blacks alive today and that is what needs to be stopped.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
You post here your consent to be stereotyped and I will tell you which stereotype you are.
Situations change but high school cliques are not all that different to fundamental primate hierarchical structure.
Let's begin with RM, the weird dude who isn't the quiet dude. It's that choirboy who sings loud and proud, it's that nerd who yells "math club leader" as the proudest title of all. RM is the weirdest motherfucker who isn't quiet or ashamed of being it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Welcome back all to EPT, the show where we explore the spectrum of one's politics!
This time we have DPR, a self-proclaimed 'pragmatic libertarian'.
He says that he equally values both freedom and peace above all else in a society but that a balance is optimal.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
This edition of ERT we have a proud Christian known as Dr. Franklin.
He hasn't revealed much else in his application than that he is a devout Christian.
Please introduce yourself, Dr. Franklin!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Welcome to EPT, let's get to it!
The past 2 shows have been people who do not identify with labels, this time we have a proud conservative, who goes further to identify as a Sermonist.
prime societal aim: To abide by the Sermon on the Mount [Matthew 5 - 7 of the Holy Bible, inclusive]. To me, this passage is not only good religious philosophy, it happens to be the premier political platform in existence.
Most of the passages mentioned have a lot to do with not 'showing off' how much suffering one is undergoing in their devotion to Jesus and the Lord God, at least in my reading it seems that way. This implies to me that Fauxlaw's outlook has a lot to do with humility and each person doing their duty and not complaining about it.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Welcome to EPT, the place where we explore the spectrum of one's political outlook, not just the place on the assumed spectrum that we'd place one!
As with the previous show, today's interview will be with a non-denominational political thinker, namely Whiteflame.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Welcome one and all to EPT! In this edition we have one of those who seek no labels, yet he applied for this show so clearly he has something to say!
I quote him in saying the following:
I've had a persisting gut affiliation with Trump and the GOP almost like a baseball fan does for his home team but they honestly don't seem to hold the answers we need.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Welcome to the Political edition of Exploration of X Thinker! Unlike the ERT, EPT will be focusing on politics and while religion may come up in conversation it by no means necessarily will.
Today we have a diehard anarchist. While this outlook is one many of us would regard as scary and immoral, it is important that we come into these things ready to have our minds opened or at least learn more about why we find the person's political system to be wrong.
I will not hold back in saying that I personally find Anarchism to be immature and immoral but that doesn't make me able to dismiss this individual's outlook as not worth hearing out. Instead, by hearing it out we can better understand the pros and cons of it more specifically and perhaps take the good parts into our own ideal political system.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Welcome to the ERT, the place where we endeavour religious thoughts.
Today on the show, we have DPR [TheDredPriateRoberts] who identifies as Agnostic on his profile but seeks to not be labelled at all. It is important that we take note that he is unlabelled and non-theistic rather than a non-denominational Theist or Deist, so that we take into account that this individual doubts God's existence altogether.
Doubting doesn't just mean lacking conviction and that is something we certainly wish to prove on this show.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Welcome, one and all, to the ERT!
Today, on our show, we have someone who isn't religious but who wishes to speak on religion, he's an agnostic and an atheist (which he refers to as agnostic atheism) who goes by the name Press.
Since he has left very little in terms of his beliefs or thoughts on reality, it would be best to let him introduce himself and his stance.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
In the religion forums, I have begun interviewing people about their beliefs, I wish to do a very similar thing with Politics (but this of course will have more structure and censoring via avoiding asking certain things).
I am not here to convince, I am here to help you get your voice out there in a structured way.
See these 2 interviews and how they unfold if you're skeptical (there will be more hopefully):
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/4312-exploration-of-the-religious-thinker-interview-2-rosends
Apply with the following:
Name you want to be addressed with (including Mr/Mrs/Ms etc): (it can be your username)
Political label I affiliate with: (if you don't, state such)
Motive to engage in the interview: (being understood, showing off, entertaining the audience, learning as you're asked to explain etc)
In your opinion, is freedom, harmony, prosperity, intelligence or some other such priority the top thing for society to aim for?
Your answers to these things will help me structure the beginning of the interview and I will evolve based on your answers both here and inside the interview.
Applying does not guarantee acceptance, I am free to decline applications.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Politics
Welcome back seekers of divine truth, our journey continues!
This time we have the mysterious Rosends to discuss Judaism and all that it entails with us.
In the words of Orthodox Jew Rosends, God is neither good nor evil:
These are human labels which we use to try and wrap out finite brains around an infinite concept.
Wow!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Welcome one and all to the first interview of the show! It is none other than Mr. Eternal AKA EtrnlVw!
He says this of his beliefs:
At the very, very core of your being, you and God are one and the same (surprise), God is the Watcher of all your observations.
and it is to the very, very core of his beliefs that we wish to get!
He seems to believe that God is essentially the head of a complex web of heirarchy of conscious entities and within all, at the core of it all is God pulling the strings... Alternatively, is God the one inside going along the ride and we are the ones experiencing it for this entity?
We shall find out here on the Exploration of the Religious Thinker!
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
This is not just because Jeff made his interviews, this is actually something I have always wanted to do.
In fact, one of my dream careers in a utopia would be a world renowned interview-focused journalist. I want to genuinely ask you about your outlook.
Apply with the following:
Name you want to be addressed with (including Mr/Mrs/Ms etc): (it can be your username)
Religious label I affiliate with: (if you don't, state such)
Motive to engage in the interview: (being understood, showing off, entertaining the audience, learning as you're asked to explain etc)
In your opinion, if God/s is/are real, is/are he/she/it/they good, evil, neutral or a complex combination?
The rest will be explored in the interviews and they'll begin based on your answers to this. I will evolve with your answers.
Applying does not guarantee acceptance, I am free to decline applications.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
I have spent many years contemplating this issue and at first, I realised the easy solution that atheists use which is to say that God is equally responsible for evil as good and therefore isn't a good guy/chick/thing.
The fundamental cause of good is that evil must be stopped. Think hard about this. In a situation where everyone is neutral, you can't be a good person because the others will repay you back anyway, negating how good you are. If everyone gives as good as they get and acts reasonable, noone and nothing needs to be good at all. What this then means is that the only genuinely active agents, morally, are the evil ones.
In a scenario where everyone is neutral and one evil person shows up, it then means that there is a victim or two and the others staying neutral hurts that person and causes that person to need to be evil in order to even things out again and have equal wealth and health to the others. Thus, the opportunity to be good to that victim and/or be evil to the evildoer only arises due to the initial active evil agent. You can only have good be viable due to the evil breaking away from the default of neutrality.
God must have first created us selfish and brutal, not the other way around, and what happened was that he/she/it discovered the true beauty lies in having good people to prevent the evil.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Answer the following questions:
- Stimulants, depressants or hallucinogens?
- Compassion, justice or loyalty?
- Between strategic cunning, IQ, creative thinking and fast thinking, which displays intelligence in its finest form?
Do this and I will give you an image that represents you.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I was opposed to Ragnar at the beginning. When he was recruited, he had displayed very little supporting him to be a good person or realiable moderator. Nonetheless, since then it has been apparent that he has put a lot of effort into the moderating of the website and while I still think that bias is a factor in his decisions. It seems that his bias is actually wise now, based strongly on keeping toxic people away from being toxic while letting nicer users have second chances).
Of course, I do not doubt that Virtuoso being Chief Moderator has helped Ragnar to make wise decisions, I do notice something that you can't fake; no user complains about the moderators anymore except for extremely toxic ones. The most I see in the religion forums in a rage is 'omg I have to take time off the website because I was rightfully temp-banned'.
I feel like this website has moderators who do not factor in your popularity into their decisions, but instead factor in your potential for improving your behaviour and willingness to take on board what they say. That is exactly what moderation and even the police IRL are supposed to do and I am very happy this is being done.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
You both have concluded a link between Jesus and Lucifer as well as even to Allah, that was independent of anything that I posted. I am sorry for saying Stephen copied me, it turned out that he did not do so.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Lucifer is Jesus, if you go back to my threads such as this:
This:
This:
And This:
You will see the dates (especially of the latter 2) completely supercede his own. I have even evolved the theory far more, understanding that Lucifer/Jesus is also Allah and Samael as things progress, if Jesus and Lucifer really existed (so therefore, Islam wouldn't be entirely true but could be part of a true storyline).
I also notice that Satan is actually God of the Old Testament, something which Stephen fails to do. My theory also explains why Jesus was the enemy of the Devil but God himself/herself/itself is never actually held as the enemy of the Devil, during the New Testament at least.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Tell me where this happened:
There has been many types where RM had lied about a content of the PM and I got in trouble for leaking a PM of what I said.
Do you mean that I am not allowed to expose you for turning a blind eye and enabling corruption of the Hall of Fame vote? You did that in the public Discord chat, I didn't even require any PM from you to prove it, your PMs just were intimidating me actually to fear going to the mods with chat logs.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Debating is at first tactical art that masquerades as a strategic science that masquerades as a linguistic exercise but really is a psychological experiment each time it's done (and the lab rats are the audience and judges).
I can justify this, if pushed. Asking me to justify it isn't pushing, suggesting why it's wrong and how it fails to be right is where to start.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Rap beat if you want one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP-ql2P1uR8
^ Listen to it on loop as you read.
Coronavirus Anthem
It's another day in China, all is well as if they planned every step of how they'd isolate the populace, locked doors shut-em-up,
It's another day in Iran, government ignores the facts as they oppress their people, but what is up?
Oh, the elderly are dying and the people see in Trump's America the actual fucking fact that a Republic sucks,
For what good is arbitrary rights when poor are literally incapable of affording what it is they need to 'suck it up',
Right-wing bullcrap ruining the world, 'freedom over safety' like a mantra, translated it says 'freedom only for the corrupt',
Who the hell is free when a virus slaughters all the elderly in every slum in town because the people who were nothing more than sulky numbers puff their last breath of oxygen, not weed, and people no longer buy into the propaganda pumping fiction like a succubus will bust a nut.
This is real life fools, no more excuses for the lax tax,
No more 'we should be free to give charity' the clarity of the dead body in the sacks are undeniable, try to 'fake news' your way out of the facts, ass.
It's time for humanity to see that being right-wing is a crime of the mind, it's all 'we are ahead thanks to God, but fuck all who're left behind',
It's like charging hardcore for glasses and then passing legislation that blames the hard of seeing who are poor for feeling blind,
This is an era like no other; the elderly and weak who are poor are dyin', there's no FUCKING EXCUSE anymore, it's the time to become kind,
No takebacks, no bullshit logic, no twists and turns to unwind, fuck all who are right-wing for all they're allowing to occur during this time,
Thank goodness there are social democracies trying their level best to prevail and shine,
Helping the poor just as much as the rich, every human being given the treatment, testing, information to unwind all the lyin'.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Artistic expressions
But 'create topic' is able to activate after several clicks.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I think it may be to give Illuminati more control over us, since we now rely entirely on them for information and all our communication is now as barely any is in-person relative to before.
My God(dess) supports the cunning and smart ruling over the pressured and ticked. It's not fair, but it's how life is. Let us endure.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
Have a pleasant time without me, or don't. Either way I am content for that is the way of the Tao.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Personal
Back when everyone was bandwagon lynching him off of this site, I said explicitly (I can't be bothered to find proof, dig to the time and you'll see) that while he has been toxic, he does it to the right people for the right reasons at all times.
From Analgesic.Spectre AKA zarroette, to disgusted, to Willows, to Wylted all the way through to Bench. I have found that I have very common enemies with this guy because he picks on toxic trolls and exposes them, stating matter of fact what they are.
I made this thread to honestly congratulate him and say I am happy he returned when Virtuoso was made head mod and that he is a good non-mod troll-handler for the Religion subforum.
I don't care if I get told off for congratulating him.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
Anyone who disagrees is either ignorant or corrupt.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I would like to have a Christian on this website present me proof that Lucifer became Satan rather than Lucifer becoming Jesus.
Thanks in advance.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Religion
ASK FOR YOUR RAP IF YOU ARE NOT LISTED. THIS IS A TASTER AND MEANT TO ENTICE THOSE WHO ARE CURIOUS TO ASK.
RationalMadman
Wylted (and any other names he/she may go by)
REF
ILikePie5
By G-Eazy (remix ft. Remo and Rick Ross)
Ramshutu
SupaDudz
WaterPhoenix
SigmaPhil
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Artistic expressions