Instigator / Pro
0
1494
rating
15
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#5311

Best.Korea should be banned from this website.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
2

After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1317
rating
266
debates
40.98%
won
Description

Vote PRO if you think that Best.Korea should leave DebateArt.com.

Round 1
Pro
#1
EXHIBIT A:
Excerpts from this debate:
  • "When a little girl feels strong desire for an adult, nobody should prevent her to make such a relationship."
  • "There are some people who seem to belive that children cannot feel pleasure from adults." 
  • "If a little girl expresses powerful desire to be with an adult, your disruptive involvement is unwanted."
Yes, Best.Korea actually said these things. And there's more!

EXHIBIT B:
Excerpt from this debate:
  • "Maybe the age difference could be a small problem if she is 5 years old and he is 45 years old, but they could overcome that and continue their relationship."
EXHIBIT C:
Excerpt from this debate:
  • "If a pedophile gives candy to a little girl, surely she will love him more."
EXHIBIT D:
Excerpt from this debate:
  • "Child's partner was making child happy. Taking away child's partner destroys child's happiness and makes child confused."
Looking at these quotes, I can only draw one conclusion about Best.Korea. . .

Con
#2
You gotta admit that thats funny.

I should not be banned for having a supernatural sense of humor.
Round 2
Pro
#3
I should not be banned for having a supernatural sense of humor.
Best.Korea is trying to downplay it as a joke.
But are all of your copy-and-paste arguments a joke?

Best.Korea only puts effort into about half of his arguments.
Here are some more 0-effort arguments from Best.Korea.

I could continue on and on, but you get the point.
Some users put hours of work into their arguments.
Best.Korea usually responds with only a sentence.
This is ridiculous and it needs to stop.
Con
#4
But are all of your copy-and-paste arguments a joke?
Its called effortless arguing.

Best.Korea only puts effort into about half of his arguments.
Here are some more 0-effort arguments from Best.Korea.
Sure.

I could continue on and on, but you get the point.
Some users put hours of work into their arguments.
Best.Korea usually responds with only a sentence.
This is ridiculous and it needs to stop.
I disagree.
Round 4
Pro
#7
Morality is the object. You are the subject.
Morality is the question. You are the respondent.

Morality is the question. 
An answer to a question can be correct, incorrect, or subjective.
But a question just is.

"Is that moral?"
This question is not subjective, correct, or incorrect.
This question objectively exists, but it is nothing more. 

The concept of morality objectively exists.
Your opinions on morality are subjective.


Con
#8
Well, I do like morality.
Round 5
Pro
#9
As for my round 4 argument, That was actually an accident.
My round 4 argument was supposed to be for my other debate.

Anyway, I am no longer annoyed, just don't accept any of my debates ever again.
Con
#10
Anyway, I am no longer annoyed, just don't accept any of my debates ever again.
Well, okay. I can agree to that.