Best.Korea

"Like a boxer who has practiced his counters, Benatar has anticipated a range of objections. Many people suggest that the best experiences in life—love, beauty, discovery, and so on—make up for the bad ones. To this, Benatar replies that pain is worse than pleasure is good. Pain lasts longer: “There’s such a thing as chronic pain, but there’s no such thing as chronic pleasure,” he said. It’s also more powerful: would you trade five minutes of the worst pain imaginable for five minutes of the greatest pleasure? Moreover, there’s an abstract sense in which missing out on good experiences isn’t as bad as having bad ones. “For an existing person, the presence of bad things is bad and the presence of good things is good,” Benatar explained. “But compare that with a scenario in which that person never existed—then, the absence of the bad would be good, but the absence of the good wouldn’t be bad, because there’d be nobody to be deprived of those good things.” This asymmetry “completely stacks the deck against existence,” he continued, because it suggests that “all the unpleasantness and all the misery and all the suffering could be over, without any real cost.”"

Yeah, thats what the extreme anti-natalist case amounts to. I guess someone needs to tell him that increasing life>reducing pain, and that most people disagree with him about the amount of pain in life that he obviously exaggerated to the fullest extent.

If we say that:

"women walking around half-naked = increase in rape"

Then should women dress properly in order to reduce rape?

Or is "not being raped" less important than "walking around half-naked"?

I mean, what?

Sounds like there is still light in this world.

I dont know why do people feel the need to do this to children. Its obvious that these people have no morality. They are sick.

"The Ukrainians served as the third-largest Coalition forces contingent in Iraq, with about 1,700 soldiers from 2003-2005."

Yemen, Syria, Somalia, Niger.

So why isnt USA under sanctions by the international community? 🤔

"An 11-year-old Connecticut girl deals for two years with an extreme addiction to Instagram and Snapchat before spiraling into insomnia and depression that leads her to take her own life. These harrowing cases, reported last year by Bloomberg, are among hundreds of private lawsuits filed against social networks in recent months."

When you hang a man, bomb his country and kill 1 million of his people, the least you can do is question his origins.

South Korea broke its own record regarding lowest birth rates in the world.

0.78 births per woman.

Its like promoting immorality and consumerism didnt exactly pay off for South Korea.

Even North Korea has 1.82 birth rates.

Of course, there are disagreements about why the birth rates are falling everywhere, but South Korea is the world leader and undisputed champion with so low birth rates that its population will shrink in half in 50 years.

TFR is falling everywhere. No advanced country except Israel seems able to sustain a pro-natal culture. A lowering tide is lowering almost all boats and giving rise to reasonable (and some unreasonable) suspicions that something is poisoning us—perhaps the Covid vaccines. Or perhaps the problem is a lowering of testosterone and sperm counts, traceable to plastics or seed oils.
The truth is that honor matters, far more than any chemical in our environment and far more than any set of financial incentives. In South ­Korea, a propaganda campaign effected a great shift away from family life. In most countries in the West, the campaign has been less coordinated, but perhaps even more effective for being spontaneous and pervasive. We will not restore children to the center of our society’s ideal of a life well lived until we reverse our cultural messaging—not just about children, but about the entire range of issues that touch upon what it means to be man and woman. The image of woman with motherhood near the center of her life is vital for our future, if we want to have one.

If I asked: Would you sacrifice your life to save 5 random people, most people would say no.

So most people think that 1 life > 5 lives.

I guess they failed at moral math.

They will say things like "My life is precious to me". So in their eyes, one life is more precious than five lives. Then when I ask "Why is your one life more precious than five other lives?" I get no answer, as expected. There is no answer to it. You cannot explain why you are more important than 5 other people, because you are not more important than 5 other people.

Thats why the abortionists cant explain why

1 woman is more important than 1000 children.

Or why 1>1000.

Its hard to explain indeed, because to do that you have to pretend to care about life and at the same time be supportive of an action that destroyed over 1 billion lives. 

So yes, logically, you have moral obligation to save lives.

Had no servants, yet they called him Master.

Had no degree, yet they called him Teacher.

Had no medicines, yet they called him Healer.

He had no army, yet rulers feared him.

He claimed no territory, yet they called him King.

He won no military battles, yet he conquered the world.

He committed no crime, yet they crucified him.

He was buried in a tomb, yet he lives today.

His name is Jesus.

Wonderful text. Even today, Jesus continues to heal the hearts all around the world. The thought of Jesus does so much good to those it resides in.

I dont consider psychology as a science. The psychology related studies usually have high failure rate. Any ideology that says "You are bad because this happened in your childhood" is not only very stupid, but one could even say pointless. Therefore, it is of no surprise that psychology didnt result in decrease of mental illnesses. In fact, the success rate of psychology in dealing with mental illnesses is non-existent. Prayer is more likely than psychology to cure the depression.

So naturally, to compensate for its high failure rate, psychology turns to studies in hope that it discovers something that was previously hidden.

One such study is about maternal antipathy. That is when mother dislikes her child and the effects it has on child.

"The current study provides initial evidence for differential mechanisms in the relationship between maternal antipathy, a specific, but common type of adverse childhood experience, and altered neural reward responses to social reward anticipation".

There are only two most logical conclusions that can come from this study's conclusion:

1) Make antipathy illegal, so it stops harming children

2) Force parents to pay compensations for harming their children.

Here, you will notice something. The psychologists disagree with conclusions 1 and 2, but agree with the study's conclusion.

This is equal to saying "We agree that this problem exists, but we dont want to do anything real to solve it".

What psychologists really want - and what the point of these studies is - is to get more people to visit psychologists so that psychologists can earn more money.

Unlike the religion, the psychology is not a non-profit organization.

Unlike the prayer and the talk with God, the talk with psychologist is not free.

Therefore, the point of studies is not to solve the problem, as proven by response to conclusions 1 and 2. The point of studies is to make profit from that problem.

I was thinking about this text from the Bible

Mark 10.

"As Jesus was starting out on his way to Jerusalem, a man came running up to him, knelt down, and asked,

“Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
“Why do you call me good?” Jesus asked. “Only God is truly good. But to answer your question, you know the commandments:

‘You must not murder.

You must not commit adultery.

You must not steal.

You must not testify falsely.

You must not cheat anyone.

Honor your father and mother.’"

It is incredible that God's Law is so easy to read and learn. Anyone can understand it, and it results in improvement to all those who accept it.

Compare it to the laws of countries today. You will see that the laws in countries today contain thousands of  words in hundreds of pages.

Yet all their laws are inferior to God's Law.

A child can understand God's Law easily.

God's Law is a complete Law that gives answer to all situations in life in just few minutes of reading.

Every young person should learn the 10 Commandments and the prayer "Our Father".

10 Commandments:

I cant seem to find a clear answer. I know that blessing food is desireable.

Is it okay for me to say a prayer above a glass of water before drinking it? To me, it seems like a positive activity which makes me think of God more often.

The Christian religion offers plenty of benefits to its followers. It encourages them to do good. It discourages them from evil. It gives them morality. It gives them the guide - The Holy Bible. It comforts them in difficult times with a prayer. It reminds them to think of God and pray every day. It reminds them that there is God who loves them and cares for them and expects them to do good.

What are the benefits of atheism? If God doesnt exist, the religion still has all the benefits above. However, atheism has no benefits even if God doesnt exist. It has no morality. It has no comfort for its followers. Atheism just makes life worse.

Are there any benefits of atheism? None. The fact that Christian religion is beneficial to society means that anyone promoting atheism is harming society.

Best countries in the world are Christian countries. To abandon Christianity, that would be harmful for our society.

Atheism is not just a lack of belief in God. Without God, you fall into lack of morality, lack of guide and lack of comfort.

We need religion. It is our basis for life. The fact that life is better with religion proves that religion is correct and atheism is wrong.

God hates the corrupt. God punishes the corrupt by diminishing their numbers.

Well, it was about time.

How would you call a person that identifies as "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" and says that demonic moaning is her pronoun?

Somehow, people these days have convinced themselves that they are very smart, even smarter than God. Their stupidity shows itself. When they talk about abortion, it is like they lose their brains entirely. They say: "abortion is good". Is a false statement. They are deceived by the satan.

Abortion is murder. You have no right to kill your child. There is no situation in which it is justified for you to kill your child.

The list of their nonsense excuses being:

No, you do not get to kill your child if you are raped. Being raped does not give you any special rights in this society. You do not get to kill anyone if you are raped. In fact, you should consider it enough that you arent forced to marry your rapist, and then you should move on with your life and raise your child which you are lucky to have in the first place.

That sentence makes no sense and is circular.

The woman, who only exists thanks to God, belongs to God. The God, the creator of life, is also the owner of life. So when a God asks you: "Why did you kill your child?", what will you say? You thought it was a good thing to do? You thought that, after being gifted with life, you can use your life to take away life from others? You support death and God will reward you with death.

No, you do not get to kill your child if your life is in danger. What kind of a mother sacrifices her child so that she may live? The real mothers sacrifice themselves for their children. This should really be taught more, because people keep forgetting it.

After you have sacrificed billions of children to Satan, you should not be surprised when God destroys your society and replaces it with those who are worthy, noble and good. Your society, that supports corruption, gets more and more corrupt every day. With that, every day it gets closer to its own collapse. God will replace your society with society fit for service to the God, the society that doesnt kill its children and society that doesnt spill its own seed. Your time of judgment comes closer and closer. Be not surprised by the God's wrath which you caused. Did you not say before: "Where is God's punishment?"?

Biden keeps saying things that make no sense, some creepy things too. What is strange is that he says things out of nowhere, completely uncalled for, unprovoked.

As Christian grows up, he reads the Holy Bible. This gives him the perfect moral system and clear instructions in life. He knows exactly what to do and what not to do. He knows that he cannot lose in this life because he is a believer. This gives him confidence. This gives him foundations for knowledge. The Christian is great at life because he follows the creator of life.

As atheist grows up, he has no guidance or manual of life. He even becomes ignorant and denies the moral system of the Bible just because it is from the Bible. Atheist, having no moral system, cannot succeed in life. He does not know how. He has no book to gain proper knowledge from, since only Bible contains proper knowledge and he denies it.

"Thou shall not kill" - a perfect command to make perfect society. The moral system based on an increase of life and the saving of life is the perfect moral system. The fact that our God defined the perfect morality in one single sentence proves how superior our God is.

This perfect morality that is the foundation of knowledge that every Christian has, provides Christians with great power to create perfect society and have a perfect life.

This moral system based on an increase of life is logically the best, and also best economically and best for survival of society.

The Holy Bible defined the welfare policies being: clothes, house, food, water, medicine and the word of God.

These welfare policies make people more supportive of the system and their country, increasing productivity and loyalty and satisfaction. Societies that dont have welfare policies have proven themselves to be failing societies, since the poor people there are more unhappy, the rich more greedy.

 

The Holy Bible defined the perfect economy: hard work, simple life and sharing.

This is the foundation of every economy. Hard work creates great profit. Simple life lowers the costs. Sharing creates friends and allies.

The Holy Bible defined proper hierarchy in society: commanders of tens, fifties, hundreds and thousands.

Hierarchy is necessary in society. The Bible explained how hierarchy is created properly so that management is done easily on a local level. Hence, why central government with plenty of small local governments is superior to central government alone. In this way and in later writings, Bible confirmed the superiority of state made from communes.

The Holy Bible defined consequentialism, providing us with correct thinking: tree that gives good fruit and tree that gives bad fruit.

In this way, Bible also defined experiments and statistics. "The results matter" is the principle of the Bible and a perfect basis for science.

The Holy Bible explained to us the basics of message spreading. Jesus set 12 disciples to spread his message everywhere. Those 12 disciples each then employed workers and their workers employed more workers under their service until the message was spread throughout the world.

Christians cannot lose. We can win and only we can win.

What can you do to me that can harm me?

If you torture me, you increase my reward in heaven.

If you kill me, you send me to heaven immediatelly.

If you dont kill me and dont torture me, I will then enjoy this world as well as the next world.

The success of the Holy Bible in its superior wisdom proves that atheists are indeed foolish for rejecting it and are doomed to failure. Atheists have nothing to gain in this life or the next. Christians will win always, since they worship the creator of life and the founder of logic and love.

Both Marx and Bakunin agreed:

Society should be made from small self-governing communes. Each commune is to own its means of production and regulate its territory. These communes are supposed to be small enough to allow easy management. So one commune would have around 50 - 100 people in it. They would regulate production, set prices of their products and manage problems.

Society would be consisted of these communes.

Now, where did Marx and Bakunin disagree?

Marx believed that after overthrowing capitalism, there should still be a state to ensure order and keep communes from fighting each other, as well as to protect the communes from capitalist invasion and influence.

Bakunin believed that state is to be abolished. After overthrowing capitalism, people would simply organize themselves in self-governing communes without any state.

Marx said that state is crucial for survival of communes.

Bakunin said that state would just turn into oppressive dictatorship.

Eventually, it was the Marx's wish that came into existence through revolution in Russia, China, Korea...ect.

After the revolutions and establishment of the communist state, Communist societies became something more than societies of communes. They became militarist societies, with arms race and Korea giving birth to Songun politics.

The communes still play a role in China and Vietnam, where some buisnesses are ran by communes.

The Bakunin's version of Communism, the self-governing communes without the state, didnt become reality. However, there were and there still are plenty of communes around the world that seem to be working fine.

I dont know if anyone else noticed this, but I discovered that if you change the angle from which you are looking at video, the video itself changes.

The more you turn your phone left/right, people in video get thinner. It also changes as you move the phone closer to eyes.

The first Christian commune in the Bible was a community of hard working individuals who also had a duty to share their wealth with those in need.

"42 They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. 43 Everyone was filled with awe at the many wonders and signs performed by the apostles. 44 All the believers were together and had everything in common. 45 They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. 46 Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, 47 praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved."

Acts 2 45: "they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need."

This describes how society should work. There are those who are in need, and society helps them.

The needs, according to Bible, are: housing, food, water, clothes, medicine and the kind word. Kind word being primarily from the word of the Bible.

The debate that happened wasnt special in itself. The topic was if veiling is good or not. Muslim argued that it is.

You can see the full debate here:

However, what is special and worthy of observation is the muslim actually uploaded the debate to his channel too, but he blured the woman's face entirely.

He always blurs women in his videos:

This same muslim argued for death penalty for apostasy in this debate:

His vision of perfect society is all women being blured and people being killed if they ever leave islam.

Is this your vision of perfect society?

Owning a car should be a crime since sooner or later you are going to run someone over.

Also, the claim that you cannot function without a car is false, since humans have functioned without a car for thousands of years.

Its like me saying that I cannot function without my smartphone. Its an obvious lie, but this society is based on lies so I might as well join in.

Science says: 

"People who are relatively short and those who wish to be taller tend to have more “Dark Triad” traits, according to new research published in Personality and Individual Differences."

"The Dark Triad refers to a set of three related personality traits: psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. Psychopathy is characterized by a lack of empathy and remorse, impulsivity, and a disregard for social norms and rules. Narcissism is characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance, entitlement, and a need for admiration. Machiavellianism refers to a tendency to be manipulative, cynical, and lacking in morality."

"shorter people and those who wished to be taller tended to exhibit more psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism."

"Shorter people, especially those who wish they were taller, are more characterized by traits that are likely to make them show-off, be confrontational, and interested in power,” said Jonason, the author of “Shining Light on the Dark Side of Personality.."

"But why would shorter people tend to have more dark traits? The researchers said that “these relationships may be best understood from an evolutionary framework, suggesting that when people cannot be physically formidable, they may then be psychologically formidable instead."

"When individuals are physically smaller or weaker, they may use psychological tactics to compensate for this. For example, shorter men may demand respect, acquire resources, and impress romantic partners with their personality traits, while shorter women may use deception to appear more desirable or gain protection and resources. These psychological tactics may provide advantages in survival and mating, and may offset physical disadvantages."

I thought that US has the largest navy, but apparently China is just better at building things, including warships.

Chinese economy, now almost using North Korean military first policy, is becoming more and more a military economy where more and more money is going to military.

China spends around 200-300 billion dollars on the military. This might seem small compared to US spending over 700 billion. However, you must understand that US pays more money for same things. This is due to price difference. In the US, military production is privately owned and the government pays the price that private companies ask.

China has mostly state-owned military production. This reduces the prices, allowing China to get more from less.

China is likely to completely overtake the US in the military strength.

God punishes nations that are disobedient. God does this by destroying their offspring and reducing their birth rates and their numbers, giving them diseases, misfortunes and wars and conflicts and civil wars to eradicate them.

We can see the examples of nations having very low birth rates, because they are sinning too much. They are dying nations.

"I have seen these people, the Lord said to Moses, and they are a stiff-necked people. Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them." - Exodus 32:9 to 32:10

"Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation" - Exodus 34:7

Exodus 34 says that children are punished, possibly destroyed or deformed, for the crimes of their parents.

This is what the Leviticus 26 says about God's punishment:

"I will do this to you: I will bring on you sudden terror, wasting diseases and fever that will destroy your sight and sap your strength. You will plant seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it."

"I will set my face against you so that you will be defeated by your enemies; those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee even when no one is pursuing you."

 "Your strength will be spent in vain, because your soil will not yield its crops, nor will the trees of your land yield their fruit."

"I will send wild animals against you, and they will rob you of your children, destroy your cattle and make you so few in number that your roads will be deserted."

Making a nation few in numbers means to eradicate them by lowering birth rates and making them die to reduce their numbers.

"If in spite of these things you do not accept my correction but continue to be hostile toward me, I myself will be hostile toward you and will afflict you for your sins seven times over. And I will bring the sword on you to avenge the breaking of the covenant."

"Bring the sword" means bring wars and violence to society.

"When I cut off your supply of bread, ten women will be able to bake your bread in one oven, and they will dole out the bread by weight. You will eat, but you will not be satisfied."

"You will perish among the nations; the land of your enemies will devour you. Those of you who are left will waste away in the lands of their enemies because of their sins; also because of their ancestors’ sins they will waste away."

This means how enemies of the nation will outnumber it greatly. God does this by causing wars and civil wars and conflicts and divisions in society.

The human society started hunting animals and eating them thousands of years ago.

Over the course of thousands of years, they got used to meat so much that its hard to imagine living without it.

Some people who turn vegetarian have before that spent decade or two eating meat.

This makes it harder to be vegetarian.

Something that their ancestors ate for thousands of years and something that they ate for decades is no longer there. Hence, they feel the lack of it.

It is like with smoking. If you never smoked, there is no urge for you to smoke. But if you did smoke, the urge is there calling you to smoke more and more.

The problem of capitalism is consumerism. Capitalism makes people work hard, thus people feel the need to reward themselves and buy themselves expensive stuff being readily offered by capitalism. Hence, the wage is always insufficient.

Of course, with meat getting more and more expensive that could be an additional motivation to abandon meat and get over the lust for it.

Or does corporal punishment just work on humans???

Hierarchy or ranking is a system of command. To put it simply, its about who commands who.

In US military, we have the president. Below him are generals. Below the generals are officers. Below the officers are ordinary soldiers.

The president's decision matters the most, since he is at the top of hierarchy.

In case general and officer disagree about something, the officer has to obey the general due to the general having higher rank. The only case where officer could disobey is if he had support from higher authority such as the president.

The system of hierarchy is not new. It exists even in animals. The first humans had a simple hierarchy with one leader being followed by a group. Later, the more advanced hierarchy was invented.

In the Bible, there are instructions on how to create hierarchy in society:

"He chose capable men from all Israel and made them leaders of the people, officials over thousands, hundreds, fifties and tens." - Exodus 18:25

"Official over thousands" is someone who has higher rank than "official over hundreds". So if a disagreement happens between those two officials, it is the "official over thousands" who gets to decide, while lower official has to obey.

Also, this part of the Bible tells us about the number of officials that should be there. "Official over hundreds" is basically one such official per 100 people.

In Sparta, the social hierarchy consisted of the Spartans at the top. They were full citizens and the ruling class. Below them were the Helots(slaves), who were forced to work and provide for the Spartans.

The two kings and the Council of Elders were at the top of the hierarchy and held the most power in Sparta.

Spartans had some respect for slaves, since slaves were allowed to own property and keep half of what they produce.

In the Roman Empire, at the top of hierarchy was the emperor, the Senate, and the patrician class, followed by the equestrian class, the plebeian class, and then the slaves.

The emperor held the most power, followed by the Senate.

The patrician class was comprised of wealthy and influential families.

The equestrian class were the professional administrators and businessmen.

The plebeian class consisted of the lower-class citizens, such as farmers.

Slaves were considered the lowest class in Roman society.

In the US government, at the top of governing hierarchy is the congress and president, since congress makes the laws and president can place veto on the decision of congress. The congress can overturn the veto with large majority vote.

It seems that almost every society in history and every military had hierarchy system in place for effective commanding.

The hierarchy system in place is there to avoid mob rule.

Hierarchy system depends on protection gained from military. Those who disobey the hierarchy are punished. Ranks in hierarchy are protected by the military that ensures that those who follow the hierarchy are protected, while those who disobey it are punished. This makes hierarchy possible. Otherwise, anyone could just disobey his generals and have no consequences or could make himself general and system would collapse.

When some person earns so much money, it is expected that he would use some of it to help the community. What Elon Musk did was good. People should appreciate these actions more. However, currently, the media is not giving enough attention to it. If more attention was given to these donations, these donations would be more common with other rich people too.

A small commune is, for example, a group of 20 people.

One such commune would have one leader who manages things like morality and helps those in need and motivates people to do good.

This seems like a representation of an original human society.

So I thought: Why isnt society made up from these small communes today?

Having a big government usually leads to government being disconnected from the people.

In a commune, a leader is in contact with his people in the commune. He knows their problems. He knows their needs. It is much harder for him to become corrupt.

However, today's society has mostly abandoned the communes in favor of "big and distanced government".

There are still some people who live in communes, but it just seems that most people prefer not to live in communes and not to have a leader.

In case of government being abolished, communes would form at random and there would even be a fight for power due to the lack of government.

The communes can instead co-exist with the government.

The original human society was a commune due to the reason that other forms of society were impossible.

When you have 20-30 people alone, they naturally form a commune with a leader.

When you have millions of people, they dont form communes, but rather a society with one big government. It doesnt have much in common with a commune, since the government is far away from the people and it is harder for it to provide help or guidance to the people.

So I thought: Why doesnt the government simply divide people in small communes? Government still stays government, but each commune would have a leader who guides it and helps those in need.

I asked AI for an opinion on the matter.

It said:

"Creating a society of communes where each commune has around 20 people and is led by a single leader is an ambitious goal. It requires a combination of leadership, organization, and commitment from all involved.
First and foremost, the leaders of each commune need to be chosen carefully. They must be respected and trusted by the members of their commune and have the knowledge and experience to lead them. The commune leaders must also be prepared to act as a mediator and facilitator between the members of their commune and the larger society.

Once the communes have been established, it is important to create a structure and system of rules and regulations that all commune members abide by. This should include rules on how decisions are made, how resources are distributed and used, and how disputes are handled.

The commune leaders should also ensure that all commune members have access to the resources and services they need to thrive. This may include access to education, healthcare, employment opportunities, and other essential services.

It is also important to foster a sense of community among the commune members. This can be done through activities such as community service projects, potlucks, and other social events. This will help to create a sense of unity and shared purpose among the commune members.

Finally, the communes should be connected to the larger society. This can be done through trade, alliances, and other forms of collaboration. This will help to ensure that the communes can access the resources they need to thrive while also contributing to the larger society.
By following these steps, it is possible to create a society of communes where each commune has around 20 people and is led by a single leader. This type of society has the potential to create a positive and sustainable future for everyone involved."

Seems like AI approves it, but considers it somewhat hard to do.

In my opinion, its not that its hard to do. Rather, people are unwilling to do it. People dont like the idea of having a leader being there and telling them what to do all the time. So it is a bit hard to figure out how to form these communes naturally in today's society and have them form in a way they  were formed at the start of humanity.

What do you think? Is it better to have lots of these small governments or just one big government? Leave your opinion about what you think is perfect society.

It feels nicer than the old look.

This could help new users.

New users will have it easier to find important options with this new design.

Most people seem to believe that plant gets nutrients from soil through roots.

However, what I found out was - it is not just through roots.

Plants can absorb nutrients from soil through it's stems and leaves too. If stem is in contact with soil, it will absorb nutrients from that soil. Stem of a plant has openings capable of absorbing nutrients.

This can be easily observed. I noticed that plant grows much better if you keep adding soil around its stem so that it is in contact with that added soil. In fact, burying a stem with an inch of soil around it while plant is little does so much for the plant. It grows much faster from the start.

The added soil must be loose.

The process is very simple. After a little plant grows 2 inches, add 1 inch of loose soil around its stem.

As plant grows, keep adding soil but dont bury the plant too much. At most, it should be 6 inches of soil in total after the plant is big.

A situation that could have been solved with simple apology from Stephen.

Polytheist-Witch didnt harm the site in any way. What she was talking about, was related to what Stephen said to her.

I dont know why do people expect to be able to "Quote Bible passages that command to kill witches", "post insulting jokes about witches being burned" and "to mention Witch's children in a very weird manner" and expect that all of that goes without response.

The Witch's response to all of that was a bit too much, but not really enough to deserve a permanent ban.

The people these days are very sensitive. What the Witch was saying, wasnt even a good insult due to being overused. I doubt that anyone was upset about it to the point where ban is needed.

Some of you are obviously happy that she is gone. In fact, some of you have made threads targeting her specifically just to get her to cross the line and get banned.

If this is how you wish for things on DebateArt to be, so be it. However, you are hardly acheiving anything other than proving that you are incapable to exchange words for words.

We will talk about "what does a vegetarian eat" and "how to weight food properly".

The food that vegetarian eats is usually: plants, eggs, milk products, chocolate, honey and sometimes insects.

Vegetarians eat plant food.

Plant food consists of vegetables, fruit, berries, nuts, seeds and grains.

Vegetables such as "broccoli, peas, beans, beetroots, potatoes, carrots, pumpkins and cauliflower" are eaten due to being high in calories and nutrients.

Fruit such as "bananas, plums, tomatoes, and peaches" are eaten due to being easy to chew and high in nutrients.

Berries such as "strawberries and raspberries" are eaten due to great taste.

Nuts such as "hazelnuts and peanuts" are eaten in moderation, for high caloric value and partially for protein.

Seeds such as "sunflower seeds" are high in protein, but also in calories. They are eaten in moderation, since they can cause a person to gain weight.

Grains such as "wheat" are usually eaten in form of bread. That being said, rice is often present too.

Vegetarians eat eggs and consume milk products.

Eggs are a source of b12 vitamin. So is milk. Some choose just eggs or just milk products. Some choose both eggs and milk products.

Vegetarians eat chocolate and honey.

Chocolate is the food that many vegetarians eat. Honey is somewhat less common. The taste of chocolate could partially make up for the lack of meat. It reminds us that vegetarian isnt just "eating leaves and greens", but has some joy found in variety of vegetarian foods.

Vegetarians sometimes eat insects.

Insects are a source of b12 vitamin. Certain insects, like "edible spiders and grasshoppers", are rather common in nature and provide a good source of nutrients. While eating insects is looked down upon in many places, in some countries you can buy them and eat them.

People often ask "How much calories in 100 grams of spinach?". What they should be asking is "how much calories are there in a cup of spinach?".

Metric cup is there to meassure volume/size of food, or how much space does food take. For example, one cup of broccoli provides much more calories than one cup of spinach, despite being same size. So eating one cup of spinach is the same in volume as eating one cup of broccoli, however the difference in calories between the two cups is large. Certain foods have more calories while occupying same amount of space. Those are good for weight gain. For weight loss, you want foods that have least amount of calories per cup.

If you follow these steps, it is expected that your battery will last at least 20% longer and your phone should be faster too.

To put things in perspective, if your battery lasts 5 hours, following these steps will make it last 6 hours or more.

This sounds very simple, but it is so good for battery. Reducing the brightness is the great way to reduce battery usage. Plus, it may also slightly increase phone's performance.

Simply reduce the brightness of display to the lowest point where you still see things on screen.

Turn off Wi-Fi when not in use

This seems easy, but many people leave it on all the time, and that could drain the battery.

Turn off Bluetooth

If you are not using bluetooth, no point to have it on.

Turn off location

If you are not using location at all, there is no point in having it on all the time.

Allowing apps that dont serve any purpose to run in the backround will just drain the battery.

Airplane mode might help reduce battery usage.

Uninstall unnecessary apps

See which apps you never use, and either uninstall or disable them.

If your phone gets hot, it damages the battery.

When charging your phone, ideally you would charge it to 70%-80% and no further. 

Also, you should not let battery go under 30%.

If you happen to follow some of these steps such as the brightness decrease, your smartphone will greatly increase in both performance and duration.

Education system improvement is an idea that plans to transform an education system to a more suitable one, where children are motivated to learn and that produces great results as confirmed by the historical application of the system.

Education system improvement is a method of rewarding knowledge with money from the very start of the person's education.

From the start of the person's education and during kindergarten, money rewards are to be introduced for problem solving and tasks.

Education system improvement is to be implemented in all schools. Students are to be rewarded with money when they achieve a certain grade. Higher the grade, higher the money reward. The grade should represent a solved task. If someone solves a very difficult task, he should get more money. A congratulation is also desirable to occur.

Education system improvement means "to reward a student with money for every successfully completed task". We already have seen many studies done on "rewarding children for tasks". Now we need to demand that the "reward system" presented by "Education system improvement" is implemented on a large scale to achieve grand results.

Education system improvement is also consisted of implementing AI technology in education to further improve the education with revolutionary power of technology.

Countries that implement "Education system improvement" will have great advantage in the education of their population properly

In the factory farm, animals are crowded together. They live in horrible conditions with no freedom or entertainment. When the right time comes, they get slaughtered, then turned into food and finally are eaten by humans.

In the factory farm, animals are usually beaten and treated very poorly. They dont know what is sunlight, or grassland, or mountain, or flower. They dont know the joys of running in the field or drinking spring water.

In the factory farm, animals are separated from their babies and their babies are killed.

Baby animals are often slaughtered for profit.

The example of this is when cow gives birth to a baby, the baby is slaughtered and turned into meat. Cow's milk that was supposed to feed the baby now feeds the human.

In the factory farm, animals are often forcefully made pregnant by humans. They have no control over their sex life and have no what we refer to as life.

We multiplied animals and forced them to crowd in a cage or a very small room. We stole their land. We stole animals from the land that fed them.

We saw the land and thought "this land doesnt belong to anyone, let us take it". What we didnt see are the animals who lived there and loved their land.

"Power decides everything" has become more clear than ever. Animals dont have power to defend their land, so it is not their land. But it is their land. It is where they lived for thousands of years, only to be captured and enslaved by humans.

The plan to give the animals their land back is a plan that is as complicated as it is simple. If you are ready to do it, it is simple. If not, then it is complicated.

To release billions of animals into the wild is a great task never achieved before. We must make sure the land  is suitable for them. That there is food. That there is no cars to hit them.

Sadly, some animals wont be released due to lack of land. Those animals should be used for "eggs and milk industry" and never for "meat industry and factory farming".

It will be hard work. I am sure we will never succeed completely. Only partially.

This is what humans are supposed to do. Vegetarian diet may not be as tasty as meat, but it is suitable for us. It is entirely possible to live on it.

Besides, the joy of eating meat is a joy that disappears in 5 minutes after it appears. "Extra joy" is hardly a justification for our actions that are everything except joy for billions of animals we imprisoned and tortured.

We even force our children to eat meat, lying to them that they wont grow unless they eat it. In a sense, what we saw as great could be the worst thing we have ever done.

However, we can still reduce the harm of our future actions.